Every figure below is computed live from the 2025 Pavement Condition Rating (PCR) file for the Cleveland network. Grades follow your band definitions: A 91–100, B 81–90, C 71–80, D 61–70, F 60 and below.
| Grade | PCR | Segments | Area (SY) | Miles |
|---|
Each grade band maps to the most cost-effective treatment. Preventive infrared work protects streets that are still sound; repaving rehabilitates the middle; saw-cut reconstruction is reserved for full structural failures — the method of last resort and the most expensive per square yard.
Excellent pavement (PCR 91–100). Seal cracks before water intrusion begins; no surface treatment required this cycle. Lowest cost-per-mile in the program.
PREVENTIVE · SEALANTGood pavement (PCR 81–90). Kasi Infrared Patriot heats, scarifies and recompacts distressed patches with no cold joints — a seamless, waterproof repair that keeps a B street from slipping to C. Only the distressed fraction of the surface is treated.
INFRARED · CORRECTIVE-PREVENTIVEFair pavement (PCR 71–80). Infrared remains viable for potholes, utility-cut and edge repair; segments trending toward D are flagged for mill-and-overlay in the next cycle.
INFRAREDPoor pavement (PCR 61–70). Structurally sound base but a failing surface: repave the full segment area. This is your adjustable $/SY repave rate in the model below.
REPAVE · $/SY ADJUSTABLEFailed pavement (PCR ≤ 60). Base course has lost support; surface treatment would fail within a season. Saw-cut to full depth, rebuild base, and repave. Longest-lived repair (10–15+ yrs) and the highest unit cost.
RECONSTRUCTION · FULL-DEPTHSet your unit costs and annual budget. The model runs a worst-first program: reconstruct F, repave D, then apply preventive infrared to C and B — while the untreated network keeps deteriorating. Every number, table and chart below updates live.
| FY | Total Budget | Reconstruct (SY) | Repave (SY) | Infrared (SY) | Segments | Lane-Mi | F Backlog Left | Mean PCR |
|---|
Surface area (SY) in each grade, by ward. Use this to target the annual program equitably — the highest F-area wards carry the largest reconstruction backlog.
Wards are colored by mean PCR grade. Click any ward — on the map or in the table below — to see its pavement condition: mean PCR, grade, the A–F grade mix, and failed-pavement (F) backlog. The map and table stay in sync. Ward 8 (Hough) holds the largest F backlog (~1.27M SY).
| Ward | Segments | Mean PCR | A | B | C | D | F | F-Reconstruct $ |
|---|
Each of the 15 wards receives a share of the annual program budget set in Section 04, allocated worst to best: a ward's share equals its share of the citywide repair need at the current unit rates (F reconstruction + D repave + infrared on B/C). A Council member can add Casino funds on top and see the ward's projected year-end PCR.
| Year | No funding | SRF only | SRF + Casino | F left (SY) |
|---|
| Ward | Mean PCR | Repair need | Share | SRF $/yr |
|---|